Welcome to my blog created for “English for Specific Purposes”, a course which helped us to develop team-building skills needed for our on-going practice and learning as a lifelong process. Writing with others implies a co-learning experience where members support and rely on each other to achieve an agreed-upon goal. This virtual space will lead us to reflect upon the role of collaborative writing in our professional development. So, I would like to open this blog mentioning Brown’s (2001) words; “Don’t buy into the myth that writing is a solitary activity! Some of it is, to be sure, but a good deal what makes a good writer can be most effectively learned within a community of learners.”
Thanks to my peer, Nilda Acosta, for sharing this experience with me.
Book Critique
of [Cartas a quien pretende enseñar]
Cartas a quien pretende enseñar or Professora
sim; tia nao: cartas a quem ousa ensinar, in its original title, was
written by Paulo Freire (2006) and translated by Stella Mastrangelo.This third edition was published in 2006 by
Siglo XXI Editores Argentina S.A.The
author was a well- known Brazilian pedagogue who devoted his life to making
contributions to the teaching-learning process. Throughout his piece, the author
highlights the fact that theory and practice are interrelated and he mentions
the factors which affect these two educational dimensions.
Especially noteworthy was the selected writing style that the author chose:
an epistolary format to make educators become involved in the narrative and
identify themselves with his experiences. In addition, this book is divided
into twelve chapters; the first one entitled Primeras Palabras represents a brief introduction for the following
sections which go from the first letter to the tenth letter. To conclude his
work, Freire (2006) adds Últimas Palabras,
summarizing his ideas and making suggestions for educators from the twenty-first
century.
In all these sections, Freire
(2006) defines the personal qualities of a good teacher and he claims that an
evident connection must exist between what the teacher says and what she
does.Furthermore, he remarks that
teaching is a dual process in which both, teacher and students learn from each
other.It could be inferred through the
reading that this result can be achieved through the dialogue, considered a key
element in education for it allows an enriching exchange of different points of
view.
In his work, Freire (2006) states that “precisamos ejercitar la
capacidad de observar registrando lo que observamos” (p.5); so observation is
essential for teachers’ role.What is
more, the author acknowledges reflection as the basis for professional
development since it promotes self-criticism to improve educational practices.Apart from that, this book reveals the
difference between talking to the students and talking withthem.For this reason,
Freire (2006) includes the concept of humility in his book and he considers it
as a tool to accept others’ knowledge.
All in all, this book is aimed at trainee-teachers and teachers in
service who could find in it a source of amazing and fruitful ideas to improve
their own practices.However, it would
have been even better if Freire (2006) had included the analysis of other
teachers’ real experiences in his letters.Ultimately, this book resumes the knowledge, experience and personal
qualities needed to reach the ultimate goal of transforming learners into
critical thinkers.On the whole, this
written piece succeeds in making educators confirm and restate their vocation
for teaching.
Reference
Freire, P. (2006). Cartas a quien pretende enseñar (3rd ed.).Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI
Editores Argentina.
The article by González, Escartín and Pérez (2003) deals with the issue
of using Critical Incident Technique (CIT) as a tool for teachers’ development
andas a strategy to integrate theory
and practice in the educational field.Hence, empirical data could be valuable not only for graduated teachers
but also for trainees since “Critical incidents are described as a pre-service
and in-service teacher education strategy” (González, Escartín & Pérez, 2003).
González, Escartín and Pérez (2003) state that Critical Incident
Techniquerepresents a useful tool for
both novel and experienced teachers since it allows us to share experiences and
reflect upon them.As regards novel
teachers, we could assume that they lack the integration of theory and
practice; for this reason, they need to know about what really happens in our
classrooms during the teaching practices.
Considering experienced teachers, we could affirm that their
professional development is based on reflection since “la reflexión es el eje
que relaciona, confronta, diferencia e interioriza ideas nuevas con las
anteriores” (Marcelo, 1996; Day, 1994).As a consequence, CIT can serve as the basis to make permanent
adjustments which foster the enrichment of all participants in the
teaching-learning process.
There are many questions about CIT to be answered: Why should we use
it?And, what should we implement it
for?It can be inferred that this
technique promotes a continuum learning process based on intensive analysis of
daily classroom situations.According to
Angelides (2006), CIT should be implemented to make teachers gain insights in
the educational field positioning them as insider researchers of their own
practice.
The previous quotation reminded me about my experience as a teacher
trainee and I regret not having CIT as a method to gain empirical knowledge a
priori.As a conclusion, teachers should
conceive learning as an endless process which requires collaboration from all
members because we are “part of a community of theory builders that talk with
each other in order to pursuit of a better theory” (Brown, 2000, p.290).As a result, CIT represents a vehicle for
spreading anecdotes which can be a valuable source to solve future incidents in
the field of education.
References
Angelides, P. (2006).Supporting
the continued professional development of teachers through the use of
vignettes.Teacher Education Quarterly. Fall, 2006.Retrieved October 2011, from
Brown, H. (4th ed., 2000). Principles
of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Day, C.W. (1994). La
reflexión: Una condición necesaria pero no suficiente para el desarrollo
profesional. Revista Interuniversitaria
de Investigación Educativa. (pp. 67-79).
Fernandez González, J.,
Elórtegui Escartín, N. & Medina Pérez, M. (2003). Los incidentes críticos
en la formación y perfeccionamiento del profesorado de secundaria de ciencias
de la naturaleza.Revista universitaria de Formación de Profesorado, 17-001. Zaragoza, España: Universidad de
Zaragoza. Retrieved
October 2011, from
Critical
incident report: A risky but fruitful discussion
Not only teachers but also other professionals can reflect upon their
own practices by means of effective techniques. Critical Incident Technique
(CIT) is one of them since it is used for gathering empirical information by
analyzing people’s actions and behavior in specific contexts.
Three months ago, I began to work as a substitute teacher in a state-run
school in La Matanza.There, I met a
group of twenty-eight students who had only taken two lessons of English up to
that moment.For this reason, I tried to
design my lessons bearing in mind we had to work hard to make up the
undelivered lessons.As a result, I
implemented games and interactive tasks to activate students’ schemata and lead
them in a smooth progression to achieve the knowledge and skills they needed.
Despite my efforts, a group of five students did not work at all. As a
consequence, I decided to talk to one of them, X, because he was the leader of
the group.After having a brief
conversation, X exposed he was not interested in studying for he was a football
player and he added English was not important for his future.Disregarding his arrogant attitude, I
insisted on persuading him but he reacted angrily stating he already was an
official team member.Being overwhelmed
with his words, I answered I felt pity for people like him was representing our
nation; and suddenly he left the classroom.
Next lesson, X began to work hard and this surprised me a lot.In addition, he asked me for help to finish a
task and I took advantage of this situation to rectify my statement since, at
that moment, I was proud of him.Definitely, I had provoked a change in him. First, I felt annoyed and
then, scared of a possible aggressive reaction; but, at the end, I realized it
had been a risky but a positive discussion.
In conclusion, this
incident made me reflect upon my role since Tejada (2000) stated that “los
profesionales debemos ser capaces de observar el aula y de aplicar decisiones
idóneas nuevas sobre el planteamiento de problemas del aula” (as cited in
González, Escartín & Pérez, 2003, p. 102).Furthermore,
when rectifying my words, I showed him that “teachers must be real and genuine,
discarding masks of superiority and omniscience” (Brown, 2000, p. 90).
For this reason, CIT should be implemented in programs at teachers
training colleges since this innovative tool provides professionals with an
integrative overview of their profile.Therefore, CIT could be used to depict clearly not only the cognitive
skills but also the interpersonal skills required to solve problems in the
educational field.
References
Brown, H. (4th ed., 2000). Principles
of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Fernandez González, J.,
Elórtegui Escartín, N. & Medina Pérez, M. (2003). Los incidentes críticos
en la formación y perfeccionamiento del profesorado de secundaria de ciencias
de la naturaleza.Revista universitaria de Formación de Profesorado, 17-001. Zaragoza, España: Universidad de
Zaragoza. Retrieved
October 2011, from http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=27417107