WELCOME!

Welcome to my blog created for “English for Specific Purposes”, a course which helped us to develop team-building skills needed for our on-going practice and learning as a lifelong process. Writing with others implies a co-learning experience where members support and rely on each other to achieve an agreed-upon goal. This virtual space will lead us to reflect upon the role of collaborative writing in our professional development. So, I would like to open this blog mentioning Brown’s (2001) words; “Don’t buy into the myth that writing is a solitary activity! Some of it is, to be sure, but a good deal what makes a good writer can be most effectively learned within a community of learners.”

Thanks to my peer, Nilda Acosta, for sharing this experience with me.

I am looking forward to reading your comments.

martes, 6 de diciembre de 2011

Book critique of Cartas a quien pretende enseñar


                                       Book Critique of [Cartas a quien pretende enseñar]
Cartas a quien pretende enseñar or Professora sim; tia nao: cartas a quem ousa ensinar, in its original title, was written by Paulo Freire (2006) and translated by Stella Mastrangelo.  This third edition was published in 2006 by Siglo XXI Editores Argentina S.A.  The author was a well- known Brazilian pedagogue who devoted his life to making contributions to the teaching-learning process. Throughout his piece, the author highlights the fact that theory and practice are interrelated and he mentions the factors which affect these two educational dimensions.
Especially noteworthy was the selected writing style that the author chose: an epistolary format to make educators become involved in the narrative and identify themselves with his experiences. In addition, this book is divided into twelve chapters; the first one entitled Primeras Palabras represents a brief introduction for the following sections which go from the first letter to the tenth letter. To conclude his work, Freire (2006) adds Últimas Palabras, summarizing his ideas and making suggestions for educators from the twenty-first century.
 In all these sections, Freire (2006) defines the personal qualities of a good teacher and he claims that an evident connection must exist between what the teacher says and what she does.  Furthermore, he remarks that teaching is a dual process in which both, teacher and students learn from each other.  It could be inferred through the reading that this result can be achieved through the dialogue, considered a key element in education for it allows an enriching exchange of different points of view. 
In his work, Freire (2006) states that “precisamos ejercitar la capacidad de observar registrando lo que observamos” (p.5); so observation is essential for teachers’ role.  What is more, the author acknowledges reflection as the basis for professional development since it promotes self-criticism to improve educational practices.  Apart from that, this book reveals the difference between talking to the students and talking with them.  For this reason, Freire (2006) includes the concept of humility in his book and he considers it as a tool to accept others’ knowledge.
All in all, this book is aimed at trainee-teachers and teachers in service who could find in it a source of amazing and fruitful ideas to improve their own practices.  However, it would have been even better if Freire (2006) had included the analysis of other teachers’ real experiences in his letters.  Ultimately, this book resumes the knowledge, experience and personal qualities needed to reach the ultimate goal of transforming learners into critical thinkers.  On the whole, this written piece succeeds in making educators confirm and restate their vocation for teaching.









Reference
Freire, P. (2006). Cartas a quien pretende enseñar (3rd ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina.

sábado, 3 de diciembre de 2011

Journal entry: A continuum development


Journal entry: A continuum development
The article by González, Escartín and Pérez (2003) deals with the issue of using Critical Incident Technique (CIT) as a tool for teachers’ development and  as a strategy to integrate theory and practice in the educational field.  Hence, empirical data could be valuable not only for graduated teachers but also for trainees since “Critical incidents are described as a pre-service and in-service teacher education strategy” (González, Escartín & Pérez, 2003).
González, Escartín and Pérez (2003) state that Critical Incident Technique  represents a useful tool for both novel and experienced teachers since it allows us to share experiences and reflect upon them.  As regards novel teachers, we could assume that they lack the integration of theory and practice; for this reason, they need to know about what really happens in our classrooms during the teaching practices. 
Considering experienced teachers, we could affirm that their professional development is based on reflection since “la reflexión es el eje que relaciona, confronta, diferencia e interioriza ideas nuevas con las anteriores” (Marcelo, 1996; Day, 1994).  As a consequence, CIT can serve as the basis to make permanent adjustments which foster the enrichment of all participants in the teaching-learning process.
There are many questions about CIT to be answered: Why should we use it?  And, what should we implement it for?  It can be inferred that this technique promotes a continuum learning process based on intensive analysis of daily classroom situations.  According to Angelides (2006), CIT should be implemented to make teachers gain insights in the educational field positioning them as insider researchers of their own practice.
The previous quotation reminded me about my experience as a teacher trainee and I regret not having CIT as a method to gain empirical knowledge a priori.  As a conclusion, teachers should conceive learning as an endless process which requires collaboration from all members because we are “part of a community of theory builders that talk with each other in order to pursuit of a better theory” (Brown, 2000, p.290).  As a result, CIT represents a vehicle for spreading anecdotes which can be a valuable source to solve future incidents in the field of education.
                                                        









References
Angelides, P. (2006).  Supporting the continued professional development of teachers through the use of vignettes.  Teacher Education Quarterly. Fall, 2006.  Retrieved October 2011, from
Brown, H. (4th ed., 2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Day, C.W. (1994). La reflexión: Una condición necesaria pero no suficiente para el desarrollo profesional. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación Educativa. (pp. 67-79).
Fernandez González, J., Elórtegui Escartín, N. & Medina Pérez, M. (2003). Los incidentes críticos en la formación y perfeccionamiento del profesorado de secundaria de ciencias de la naturaleza.  Revista universitaria de Formación de Profesorado, 17-  001. Zaragoza, España: Universidad de Zaragoza. Retrieved October 2011, from 
Marcelo, C. (1996). El desarrollo de la reflexión en los profesores principiantes. Bordón. (pp. 5-25).

Critical incident report: A risky but fruitful decision


Critical incident report: A risky but fruitful discussion
Not only teachers but also other professionals can reflect upon their own practices by means of effective techniques. Critical Incident Technique (CIT) is one of them since it is used for gathering empirical information by analyzing people’s actions and behavior in specific contexts. 
Three months ago, I began to work as a substitute teacher in a state-run school in La Matanza.  There, I met a group of twenty-eight students who had only taken two lessons of English up to that moment.  For this reason, I tried to design my lessons bearing in mind we had to work hard to make up the undelivered lessons.  As a result, I implemented games and interactive tasks to activate students’ schemata and lead them in a smooth progression to achieve the knowledge and skills they needed.
Despite my efforts, a group of five students did not work at all. As a consequence, I decided to talk to one of them, X, because he was the leader of the group.  After having a brief conversation, X exposed he was not interested in studying for he was a football player and he added English was not important for his future.  Disregarding his arrogant attitude, I insisted on persuading him but he reacted angrily stating he already was an official team member.  Being overwhelmed with his words, I answered I felt pity for people like him was representing our nation; and suddenly he left the classroom.
Next lesson, X began to work hard and this surprised me a lot.  In addition, he asked me for help to finish a task and I took advantage of this situation to rectify my statement since, at that moment, I was proud of him.  Definitely, I had provoked a change in him. First, I felt annoyed and then, scared of a possible aggressive reaction; but, at the end, I realized it had been a risky but a positive discussion. 
In conclusion, this incident made me reflect upon my role since Tejada (2000) stated that “los profesionales debemos ser capaces de observar el aula y de aplicar decisiones idóneas nuevas sobre el planteamiento de problemas del aula” (as cited in González, Escartín & Pérez, 2003, p. 102).  Furthermore, when rectifying my words, I showed him that “teachers must be real and genuine, discarding masks of superiority and omniscience” (Brown, 2000, p. 90). 
For this reason, CIT should be implemented in programs at teachers training colleges since this innovative tool provides professionals with an integrative overview of their profile.  Therefore, CIT could be used to depict clearly not only the cognitive skills but also the interpersonal skills required to solve problems in the educational field.  
                                                              







                                                   
References
Brown, H. (4th ed., 2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Fernandez González, J., Elórtegui Escartín, N. & Medina Pérez, M. (2003). Los incidentes críticos en la formación y perfeccionamiento del profesorado de secundaria de ciencias de la naturaleza.  Revista universitaria de Formación de Profesorado, 17-  001. Zaragoza, España: Universidad de Zaragoza. Retrieved October 2011, from http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=27417107